Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180830
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 22:04
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 156 2-Core 308 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 604 8-Core 1193 106% 898 Pts	64-Core 1,196 74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 3421) 2GB CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 26.4 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 30.4 22% 29.3 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 27.6 Splatting 33.9 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116 16,263 User benchmarks, average bench 267% 885GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1449 1500 1487 1520 1491 1339 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	330% Outstanding	Read 2499 Write 1,628 Mixed 1,231 SusWrite 1,464 380% 1,706 MB/s	4K Read 61.8 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 87.3 286% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,220 DQ Write 1,103 DQ Mixed 1,212 895% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 330% Great: 355%
ST10000NM0086-2AA101 10TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 24.5TB free Firmware: SN03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 657 664 666 658 655 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 25.5 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 25.5 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $262Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,889x
Core i9-9900KIntel $415Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,731x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,091x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	518x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	458x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	230x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	209x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	196x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $892

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16