PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140703 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '20 at 20:52 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 152 140 129 120 141 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.2 6 6 5.2 6.3 MB/s
|
6.84%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 189x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 139x |
Core i5-4690Intel $51Bench 67%, 73,695 samples | 133x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 114x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $387 |