Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 05:00
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3258-$31 23,497 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Memory 84.3 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 178 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% PwrHis(1787 201C) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 30.5 21% 27.8 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 21.7 Splatting 32.3 22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 120 108 90 81 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 426 Write 332 Mixed 289 SusWrite 119 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 38.4 144% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 41.6 66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 104%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 6 6 6.1 5.5 5.4 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	9.74% Terrible	Read 12.8 Write 3.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 5.6 10% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0 76% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB 4,503 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	189x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	139x
Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	114x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	83x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	37x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	36x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $387

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16