PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150528 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '20 at 17:41 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 74% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
62.6%
Good
|
55% 89 Pts
|
36% 296 Pts
|
22% 362 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
27.2%
Poor
|
28% 36.2 fps
|
26% 31.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 360 358 375 378 333 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
88% 390 MB/s
|
154% 52 MB/s
|
157% 209 MB/s
|
![]() Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
121GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 100 148 115 115 104 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
72% 320 MB/s
|
136% 46.6 MB/s
|
137% 200 MB/s
|
![]() Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
262GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 174 181 181 182 182 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
101% 140 MB/s
|
146% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 30 14 13 14 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
68% 63.5 MB/s
|
140% 3 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.8%
Average
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
53% 75 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 572x |
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 111x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 75x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |