Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 17:21
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 122
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 359
35% 288 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
PowerColor(148C 2337) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 44.2
28% 36.1 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 35.7
26% 30.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 364 333 364 354 235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 401
Mixed 357
SusWrite 338
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 211
158% 209 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 134%
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
121GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 116 120 108 115 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 416
Write 366
Mixed 328
SusWrite 132
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 38.8
134% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 167
140% 203 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
262GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 180 175 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 166
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 179
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 29 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 146
Write 32
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 25.6
67% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.5
134% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback