MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive490% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 16:14
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 161
2-Core 319
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1,207
109% 916 Pts
64-Core 2,220
137% 2,220 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 148
Parallax 147
123% 149 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 128
Splatting 105
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3898 3987 3994 3982 4001 3970 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
490% Outstanding
Read 2,301
Write 3,770
Mixed 2,282
SusWrite 3972
700% 3,081 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 92.8
315% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1,350
995% 1,314 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 490%
Great: 486%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
809GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2596 2630 1884 1060 1058 1060 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,717
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,857
SusWrite 1,715
406% 1,797 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 81.1
282% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,613
DQ Write 1,454
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,135% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 329%
Great: 298%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
206GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 442 442 441 441 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 436
Mixed 426
SusWrite 441
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 51
166% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79
295GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 101 103 102 99 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 174
Write 138
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 99.9
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25EE 10TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 176 179 173 173 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 178
Write 188
Mixed 112
SusWrite 177
222% 164 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 40.6
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 39.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback