MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive483% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 23:35
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 984
99% 802 Pts
64-Core 1151
71% 1151 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 156
Parallax 166
135% 163 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 140
Splatting 113
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3584 3538 3968 3994 3987 3980 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2,249
Write 2,721
Mixed 2,264
SusWrite 3,842
628% 2,769 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 93.6
318% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1475
DQ Write 1,244
DQ Mixed 1,379
1,028% 1,366 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 483%
Great: 486%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
809GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2613 2649 1856 1059 1057 1060 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1695
Write 1866
Mixed 1,882
SusWrite 1,716
405% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 84.5
290% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,564
DQ Write 1,386
DQ Mixed 1,469
1,103% 1,473 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 328%
Great: 298%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
206GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 442 440 440 440 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 434
Mixed 428
SusWrite 441
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 54.2
173% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 185
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$79
337GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 100 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 111
Write 89.6
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 99.8
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 4.9 4.7 4.4 4.8 4.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Read 34.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 5
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 37.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 39.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback