Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E756

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E756  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB293
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 14:16
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 146
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 234
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6290
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 6.44
6% 7.62 fps
MRender 9.62
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.09
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-256G-1016 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4162016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 161 192 185 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 352
Write 220
Mixed 221
SusWrite 185
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 29.9
98% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 201
182% 279 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX421S13IB/16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.3% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E756 Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E756

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback