HP 700-327c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-327c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 01:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 570
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.3% Above average
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 70.2
62% 72.8 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 53.2
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 86 93 77 81 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 497
Write 425
Mixed 411
SusWrite 134
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 0.4
32% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 130 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 142
Mixed 73
SusWrite 129
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
275GB free
Firmware: 01.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 75.9
Write 73.3
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 77.7
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-327c Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-327c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback