Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E754  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26F
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 92
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 240
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 6.97
4% 6.21 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.52
5% 5.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 410 394 398 404 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 363
Write 282
Mixed 364
SusWrite 402
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 34.3
126% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 193
173% 258 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS54755 500GB
262GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 16.4
20% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E754 Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E754

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback