Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 636
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20.36.07
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 25.4
16% 34.7 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 21.5
16% 18.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 913 915 915 926 911 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 933
Mixed 864
SusWrite 902
227% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 69.2
239% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 222
259% 433 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 208%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 119 122 124 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 66
SusWrite 119
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 23.2
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback