Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '20 at 17:19
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 186 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 357 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB CLim: 842 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 28 0% 9.4 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 25.7 23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 7.73% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 155 124 69 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 329 Write 176 Mixed 227 SusWrite 111 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 24.4 92% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 118 96% 136 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 91%
Mass Storage Device 537GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 500GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 5.3 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.27% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 10.5 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 6.8 15% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.27% Great: 6%
Mass Storage Device 537GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 500GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 13 12 11 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 13 Write 10.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 11.9 14% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	447x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	360x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	200x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	97x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369