Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB16
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 152
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15EA) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.61 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 105 58 100 109 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 105
Write 84.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 89.2
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
0GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 6.8 9.2 7.3 6.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 17.4
Mixed 17
SusWrite 7.4
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
115% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK LH531 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback