Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '17 at 14:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 112
51% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 208
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 04A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 34
Parallax 47
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 33
Splatting 38.5
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 473
Write 128
Mixed 185
57% 262 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 11
69% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 37
61% 119 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
213GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 136
Mixed 162
108% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600D3V64L1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-DS2 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback