bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1176 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '17 at 11:53
Run Duration575 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 518
44% 380 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 27.6
Mixed 30.9
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.94
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 1.71
319% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17%
Great: 87%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 35.4
Mixed 31.6
23% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.07
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.77
324% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 34
Mixed 33.9
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.07
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 1.88
347% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 16GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.9
Mixed 31.3
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.17
4K Write 2.68
4K Mixed 1.86
347% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 64 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback