Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 824
87% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 146
Parallax 143
123% 147 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 131
Splatting 107
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 118 122 128 122 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 406
Write 162
Mixed 205
SusWrite 139
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 25.4
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 51.2
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 49.4
38% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
109GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 93.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 62.5
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
272GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 81 83 83 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 87.3
Write 76
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 81.3
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 58%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB
631GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 107
Write 84.2
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 81.5
109% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
SAMSUNG HN-M750MBB 750GB
614GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 32.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.9
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GIS F4-3200C16-16GVK 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 20.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback