Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateAug 26 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 101
56% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 340
34% 278 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.5
17% 19.1 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.5
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-trio N150 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 66 53 81 59 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 453
Write 399
Mixed 302
SusWrite 71.6
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 24.8
84% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 75.9
86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 94 91 91 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 17.5
Write 97.3
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 92.3
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
904GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 126 124 123 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 124
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback