Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 03:05
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 136
58% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 221
27% 208 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 17.3
10% 13.9 fps
MRender 9.19
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 172
Write 53.7
Mixed 76.8
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 10
70% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 58.7
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 19.4
24% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Constellation CS 1TB
763GB free
Firmware: CN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 171
Mixed 165
127% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.24
101% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 113%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
329GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 126
Write 132
Mixed 100
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.98
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback