Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 15:05
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 130 57% 93.1 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 207 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 21C5) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 3.09 3% 4.28 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 4.09 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75 5,727 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10599 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2339 (B1) Unknown 100 100 148630 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 248228 (F2) Unknown 100 100 281913	68.8% Good	Read 456 Write 207 Mixed 283 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 27.6 90% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 68 92% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 931GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 220550455 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4667 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 4742417505 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16445 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2904 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 97 4295164496 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 555286561 (C2) HDA temperature 33 41 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 20 220550455 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -125554778938247 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3735784019 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2424920198	61.3% Good	Read 113 Write 101 Mixed 106 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	290x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16