ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20BFS1RF16

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20BFS1RF16 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20BFS1RF16
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '20 at 08:39
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 489 52% 413 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M 2,897 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2591 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 7.35 Parallax 8.31 6% 7.72 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 7.39 6% 6.78 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 62 2.1 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 123 Write 102 Mixed 300 SusWrite 51.4 33% 144 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 19 86% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 103 108% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 102%
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB 8,421 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 687GB free Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 458 452 464 450 469 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 457 Mixed 373 SusWrite 461 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 44.5 150% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 252 216% 318 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 120%
ST500LM0 00-SSHD-8GB 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 456GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 49 47 47 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.2% Poor	Read 112 Write 53 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 51.4 82% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 55%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	28% Poor	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 0.3 101% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 149% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 62%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 50 48 47 72 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 125 Write 124 Mixed 78.6 SusWrite 51.7 123% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 49%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 76.6 Write 86 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 5 77% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.4 196% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 70%
Sony QD-G32E 30GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 26GB free, PID 087c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 16.4 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 18.8 29% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 34,976 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback