Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 00:45
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 802
84% 676 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 98.9
64% 85.5 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 63.9
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2313 2364 2336 2391 2391 2392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 2,277
Mixed 1,791
SusWrite 2,364
464% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 381
4K Mixed 89.6
377% 170 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 1,466
DQ Mixed 1,184
896% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 382%
Great: 472%
Samsung MZ7WD480HCGM-000H2 480GB
288GB free
Firmware: HPW1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 436 434 435 433 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 293
Write 446
Mixed 325
SusWrite 432
85% 374 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 37.7
138% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 285
230% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96%
Great: 100%
Nvme M.2 PCIE G3x4 NV 1TB
792GB free
Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 947 947 947 948 948 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 2,062
Mixed 1320
SusWrite 1,125
346% 1,534 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 59
274% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 1,523
DQ Mixed 1,006
818% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 269%
Great: 269%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
78GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 452 449 451 449 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 463
Mixed 362
SusWrite 448
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 40.7
152% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 330
257% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Drevo X1 pro 1TB
748GB free
Firmware: R0817B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 415 413 414 414 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 487
Write 427
Mixed 354
SusWrite 414
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 20
117% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 25.4
75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
79GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 452 449 452 449 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 461
Mixed 425
SusWrite 448
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 46.7
172% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 347
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 116%
Great: 131%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$84
770GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 180 180 180 180 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 131
Write 219
Mixed 105
SusWrite 180
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
362% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 4TB
2TB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 76.8
Write 89.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 99.2
112% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 71%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 115
Write 95
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 109
128% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD Corsair CMK16GX4M1A2666C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback