HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8433
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 17:31
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 75
2-Core 134
56% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 222
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8433) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.03
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 18.7
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 11.7
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VX14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 61 79 132 163 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 71.6
Write 170
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 120
72% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
278% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx Builds (Compare 1,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop 590-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback