Toshiba Satellite P75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite P75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 07:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 193
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 120
36% 227 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA72) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 5.38
3% 4.92 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 6.78
5% 5.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 362 360 349 416 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 500
Write 409
Mixed 329
SusWrite 380
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 33.9
113% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 174
144% 214 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$68
770GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 210 204 205 233 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 255
Write 221
Mixed 222
SusWrite 217
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 34.6
115% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 159
112% 144 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 6.1 4.7 5.4 5.6 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 5
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 5.9
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P75-A Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback