Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130312
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 01:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 62.5
39% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 90.2
8-Core 94.7
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 97
6% 97 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
AMD(1002 9904) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 7.54
Parallax 4.59
4% 5.76 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.22
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510G1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 62 65 61 70 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 437
Write 366
Mixed 352
SusWrite 99.7
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 27.5
92% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 176
131% 173 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
187GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 46.3
Write 38.4
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 63.9
31% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-014.A 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback