Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$289
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 817
85% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,334
90% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 153
Parallax 155
130% 156 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 143
Splatting 105
120% 143 fps
Poor: 110%
This bench: 125%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$169
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1358 1018 1036 1032 1061 1045 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,462
Write 2,343
Mixed 1,718
SusWrite 1,092
426% 1,904 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 84.2
280% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,153
863% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 303%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$110
97GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 454 454 455 454 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 386
SusWrite 454
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 57.9
192% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
109GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 270 269 269 269 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 444
Mixed 350
SusWrite 288
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 51.6
176% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 154
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$132
349GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 86.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 73.1
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 60%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
952GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 101 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 81.5
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 98.1
66% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AEST.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 29.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 27.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 23,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,136
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback