Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120918
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '20 at 19:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 185 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 354 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3200) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.8% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 41.7 Parallax 37.9 36% 41.1 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 33.9 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 163 49 40 48 40 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.9% Poor	Read 159 Write 107 Mixed 106 SusWrite 72.7 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 11.8 54% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.4 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 14.1 12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 32GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 96.6 Write 100 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 70.7 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 70%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 120GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 47GB free, PID 01de Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 33.2 Write 28.3 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 27.7 40% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 7.2 526% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 140%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 73,650 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	53x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	43x
Core i7-2600Intel $135Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16