Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 18:50
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 775
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 60.6
50% 63.6 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 53.7
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 456 455 453 449 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 468
Mixed 395
SusWrite 454
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 43.5
155% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
605GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1693 1612 1636 1584 1621 1571 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,279
Write 1,552
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 1,619
374% 1,672 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 80
265% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 956
716% 955 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 315%
Great: 355%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 139 138 135 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 100
Mixed 79
SusWrite 136
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$198
7TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 234 234 234 236 236 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 72.5
Write 69.1
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 75
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 39.5
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 22.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback