HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory13 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 125
57% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 501
45% 378 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 74
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 65.4
60% 71.6 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 72.8
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 122
SusWrite 124
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 21.9
74% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 67.7
56% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7.2 4.8 8.4 7.2 8 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 22.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 6.5
16% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M391B5273BH1-CF8 50GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback