Wincomm WLPM-V22

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemWincomm WLPM-V22  (all builds)
MotherboardWincomm WLPM-V22
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 03:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 180
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 475
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD450K 256GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 204 190 179 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 476
Write 432
Mixed 389
SusWrite 201
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 35.5
124% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 104
122% 211 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS1GSH64V6B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback