Lenovo 1730AK5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 1730AK5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 01:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 321
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Device(1B4C 0000) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 3.44
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.22
4% 4.42 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD120HAFV-000DA 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 108 108 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 363
Write 130
Mixed 114
SusWrite 107
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 17.2
79% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 19
26% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
404GB free
Firmware: DEMC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 109 109 110 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 93
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 108
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 M378B2873FH0-CH9 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1730AK5 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 1730AK5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback