TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P4C800-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P4C800-E  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 41.1
39% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 41.4
8-Core 43.6
6% 42.5 Pts
64-Core 43.7
3% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 42.6%
 Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800
AMD(1002 9505) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 11
Parallax 2.16
6% 6.83 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 3.13
Splatting 12.5
7% 7.44 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.2%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 104
SusWrite 18.8
19% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 32.2
106% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87.9
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 81.6
61% 81 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 42.6%
 Great: 117%
Maxtor 6L300R0 300GB-$46
41GB free
Firmware: BAH41G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 45 45 44 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 34
Write 43
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 43.6
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
146% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 22.7%
 Great: 34%
Promise 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 149GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 33 32 29 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
Read 96.8
Write 87.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 29.9
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.7
295% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 36.7%
 Great: 36%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
5GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 99.5
Write 51.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 18.3
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 34.1%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 14%
 Great: 20%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P4C800-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P4C800-E

CPU
Pentium 4 3.40GHzIntelBench 31%, 1,108 samples2x
Pentium 4 3.20GHzIntelBench 30%, 3,160 samples2x
GPU
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples2x
Radeon X1650AMDBench 1%, 725 samples1x
GeForce 6600NvidiaBench 0%, 968 samples1x
RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples1x
4x0.5GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,291 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback