ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P4C800-E

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P4C800-E (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 43.7 40% 54.4 Pts	4-Core 43.4 8-Core 43.8 6% 43.6 Pts	64-Core 44.2 3% 44.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3800 3,400 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 9505) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 7.47 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 2.16 6% 6.84 fps	MRender 6.67 Gravity 3.13 Splatting 12.5 7% 7.44 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB 930 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 20 19 20 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 112 Write 108 Mixed 61 SusWrite 19.6 17% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 32.6 51% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 117%
Maxtor 6L300R0 300GB-$46 322 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 41GB free Firmware: BAH41G10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 34.3 Write 42.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 45.2 28% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.2 135% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 34%
Promise 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 149GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 16GB free Firmware: 1.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 32 30 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.4% Below average	Read 98.3 Write 96.8 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 30.9 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.6 288% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 36%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 5GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 19 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 98.5 Write 92.8 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 19.1 50% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.3 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P4C800-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P4C800-E

CPU
Pentium 4 3.40GHzIntelBench 31%, 1,108 samples	2x
Pentium 4 3.20GHzIntelBench 30%, 3,160 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples	2x
Radeon X1650AMDBench 1%, 725 samples	1x
GeForce 6600NvidiaBench 0%, 968 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x
4x0.5GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback