Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 08:20
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4020 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 89.7
50% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 91.4
8-Core 90.3
12% 90.9 Pts
64-Core 91.1
6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 3.94
8% 7.98 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.39
6% 7.24 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 7.1 114 42 22 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 198
Write 174
Mixed 120
SusWrite 68.1
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 16
58% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 21.3
DQ Mixed 18.3
14% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
218GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 125 123 126 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 52
SusWrite 123
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL1 Hynix DMT351U6CFR8C 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 9
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A58M-DS2 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback