bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime43.4 Days
Run DateAug 19 '20 at 04:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
CPU #000, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.2% Very good
Memory 64
1-Core 126
2-Core 240
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 747
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 698GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 383 379 392 401 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 389
Write 393
Mixed 155
SusWrite 389
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 1.8
23% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 63.3
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 7.9
18% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 68%
Eqlogic 100E-00 1.5TB
333GB free
Firmware: 9.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 21 18 13 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.67% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 9.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 16.7
9% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.17 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 35.7
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback