Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 05:42
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 816
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 45
39% 49.4 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 48
Splatting 62.6
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 403 340 341 345 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1529
Write 1449
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 437
258% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 55.8
186% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 480
332% 416 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 163%
Great: 237%
Seagate ST1000LX 015-1U7172 1TB
368GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 43 38 31 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 67.7
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 40.2
30% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
560GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 5.1 5.7 7.1 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6
4% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 216 218 218 218 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
25GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.5 11 9.4 10 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 11
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.3
171% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 27.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 25.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,021
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback