Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '20 at 04:04
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 81.6 1-Core 149 2-Core 295 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 979 94% 774 Pts	64-Core 1,431 89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% PowerColor(148C 2398) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 118 Parallax 244 123% 171 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 143 Splatting 163 118% 141 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 17,781 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 256 250 255 248 249 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 390 Mixed 281 SusWrite 257 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 48.7 168% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 187 144% 198 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 115%
PNY CS2311 1TB SSD 212 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 357GB free Firmware: CS231123 SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 456 457 457 456 457 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 455 Mixed 460 SusWrite 457 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 56.2 188% 66.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 486GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 164 166 167 166 167 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 134 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 164 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 823GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 87 87 87 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 83.6 Write 87.3 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 86.2 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 57%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 5GB free, PID 0301 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.5 2.9 4.2 6.4 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	8.6% Terrible	Read 26.1 Write 2.7 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 3.9 9% 9.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 97% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.6% Great: 17%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-32ZTB0 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 434GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 39.3 Mixed 27 SusWrite 4.3 34% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG SP2004C 200GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 156GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17% Very poor	Read 34.9 Write 35.5 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 34.2 46% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 40.2 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 27.5 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 41 90% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,674x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,442x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,257x
RTX 3080Nvidia $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,475x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,849x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $59Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	648x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16