Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '20 at 18:04
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9800E APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 125
46% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 206
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 13.9
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.1
8% 9.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 8%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 44.6
35% 40.2 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 39.1
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0801A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 117 58 40 28 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 423
Write 358
Mixed 18
SusWrite 74.5
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.1
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 37.6
49% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 136 132 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 112
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 134
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback