TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17C5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17C5  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 53.7
30% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 315
23% 211 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 36.2%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1215) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 3.28
2% 24.9 fps
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.62 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 238 174 180 179 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 647
Write 676
Mixed 401
SusWrite 197
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 17.2
56% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 228
171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 171%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
594GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 106 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 138
Write 103
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 105
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 69.7%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 32.5%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17C5 Builds (Compare 1,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C5

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,444x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples3x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples653x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples460x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples332x
SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples229x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GBWDCBench 139%, 2,393 samples119x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples52x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples306x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples89x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples87x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback