Asrock Z77 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '17 at 02:14
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 435
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 58.6
38% 45.7 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 40.1
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 269
Write 257
Mixed 264
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 15.2
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 14.6
21% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
835GB free
Firmware: BD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 99.2
Mixed 101
75% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.42
102% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 66%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Read 16
Write 5.76
Mixed 7.98
11% 9.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.56
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
15% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme3 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback