Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 11:18
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 128
62% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 448
41% 346 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$41
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 95 103 96 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.6% Poor
Read 196
Write 191
Mixed 8
SusWrite 94.2
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 7.7
49% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 13.8
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 76%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 179 184 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 180
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Kingston DT 101 II 2GB
1GB free, PID 1613
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.1 0 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 2.2
7% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 6%
Generic USB SD Reader 268GB
250GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 11 11 11 11 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.57% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 10
8% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback