Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 136 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 466 43% 360 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8388) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.48% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.48% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 91 92 103 104 98 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.9% Below average	Read 224 Write 186 Mixed 188 SusWrite 97.5 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 12.3 69% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 13.2 18% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 76%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49 9,420 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 465GB free Firmware: MS1OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 92 95 105 104 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 161 Write 154 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 99.5 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.2 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	91x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	56x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $171