MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 19:40
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 272
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 894
83% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 187
Parallax 187
145% 184 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 177
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,241
Write 475
Mixed 644
241% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 45.6
185% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 547
DQ Mixed 416
354% 518 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 333%
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
230GB free
Firmware: LHF002C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 517
Write 469
Mixed 459
107% 482 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.6
218% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 249
208% 299 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 117%
XPG SX950U 960GB
799GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 516
Write 458
Mixed 403
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 48.2
168% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 261
196% 256 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.7
Write 123
Mixed 67.5
67% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate ST2000NE0025-2FL101 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EN02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 159
Mixed 81.3
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
256% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 109%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
788GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 94.3
Mixed 36.8
93% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 49%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 94.3
Mixed 38.5
94% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
454GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 93.5
Mixed 56
108% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 51%
Innostor Ext. HDD 1TB
788GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 55.2
Write 152
Mixed 38.5
115% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 04CD F4-3600C19-8GSXW 859B BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 04CD F4-3600C19-8GSXW 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 30.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7B46) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $701
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback