Acer Aspire M5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M5810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMP55
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100329
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 20:45
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 67
2-Core 131
59% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 258
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 35.1
32% 34.4 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 34.1
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
107GB free
Firmware: 8105
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 183
Write 139
Mixed 146
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 14.9
56% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 53.5
DQ Write 32.2
DQ Mixed 8.73
16% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 35%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.1% Below average
Read 193
Write 60.8
Mixed 85.7
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 15.6
76% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 78.4
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 22.9
30% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
647GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 101
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.43
95% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Sony Hard Drive 500GB
261GB free, PID 05bf
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 69.4
91% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.14
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Toshiba 9905403-169.A00LF M378B5673EH1-CH9 Toshiba 9905403-169.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5810 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback