Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 15:25
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 165
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 626
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1286
80% 1286 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 60 60 62 75 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.3% Good
Read 267
Write 35.9
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 93.4
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 23.7
117% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 169
164% 255 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
466GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 124
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 167
Mixed 115
SusWrite 173
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback