Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 16:07
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 285
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3540
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 4.38
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.65
5% 5.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225L Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 499
Write 185
Mixed 244
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 29.6
116% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 69.4
86% 152 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 89%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
899GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 179
Mixed 82.2
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.2
96% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Sony Storage Media 4GB
4GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27.9
Write 8.48
Mixed 1.85
12% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-003.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2H Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback