Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 14:45
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 332
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 27.3
27% 30.2 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 28.3
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 133 50 48 58 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 237
Write 207
Mixed 196
SusWrite 76.6
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 14.5
80% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 55.4
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 115
80% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
211GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
Read 73.2
Write 56
Mixed 46
SusWrite 76.6
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
472GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 83.7
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 87
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback