Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 10:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 134
59% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 345
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 80
Parallax 75.2
67% 79.2 fps
MRender 78.3
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 58.8
56% 70.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 106 120 125 124 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 246
Write 107
Mixed 175
SusWrite 115
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 27.5
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 105
87% 127 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 83 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 85.8
Write 93.1
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 80.6
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback