Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '20 at 12:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 192
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 477
53% 419 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3375 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 82.2
66% 81.5 fps
MRender 76.7
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 58.4
56% 69.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 117 124 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 299
Write 121
Mixed 169
SusWrite 119
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 25.8
102% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 93.6
86% 134 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 82 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 85
Write 91.1
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 81.6
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback