TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 04:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 845
79% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 79%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4013)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Lighting 95.1
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 82.9
78% 88.8 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 80
Splatting 78.8
74% 93.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 76.4%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 333 335 334 330 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 459
Mixed 444
SusWrite 310
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 45.2
177% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 262
225% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 129%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
59GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.68% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 20.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 20.2
22% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 8.68%
 Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 23.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 68.6%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples7,834x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples2,772x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD  $190Bench 84%, 294,959 samples1,869x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,456x
RX 5700-XTAMD  $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples1,304x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,122x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples655x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples534x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 212%, 171,271 samples530x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples1,937x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples983x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples761x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback