Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 23:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 914
82% 690 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1338 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.3.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 89.3
52% 74.2 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 55.3
50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 199
Write 178
Mixed 813
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 39.4
134% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 20
58% 125 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 157%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
491GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 159
Mixed 141
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.38
142% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback